The Journal of Economics and Business Letters is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and originality in all published works. As part of this commitment, the journal implements a rigorous plagiarism screening process to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are free from unethical practices and meet established scholarly standards.

Originality is a fundamental principle of academic publishing. Authors submitting manuscripts to the journal are required to ensure that their work is entirely original and has not been previously published or submitted elsewhere. All sources, references, and contributions from other works must be properly acknowledged through accurate citation and referencing.

The journal considers plagiarism in any form—whether intentional or unintentional—as a serious violation of publication ethics. This includes copying text, ideas, data, or figures from other sources without proper attribution, as well as self-plagiarism, where authors reuse their previously published work without appropriate citation.

All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Economics and Business Letters undergo plagiarism screening prior to the peer review process. The journal utilizes reliable plagiarism detection software to compare submitted manuscripts against a wide range of academic sources, including journals, books, conference proceedings, and online content.

The purpose of this screening is to identify similarities between the submitted manuscript and existing published works. The editorial team carefully reviews the similarity report generated by the software to assess whether the detected similarities are acceptable or indicative of plagiarism.

While there is no universally fixed threshold for similarity, the journal generally expects manuscripts to have a low similarity index. A similarity level exceeding acceptable limits may raise concerns and lead to further evaluation.

It is important to note that not all similarities indicate plagiarism. For example, similarities may occur in commonly used phrases, references, or methodological descriptions. Therefore, the editorial team conducts a qualitative assessment to distinguish between acceptable similarity and unethical copying.

Manuscripts with minor similarity issues may be returned to the authors for revision, with instructions to properly paraphrase or cite the relevant sources. However, manuscripts with significant or suspicious similarities may be rejected outright.

The journal recognizes several forms of plagiarism, including but not limited to:

• Direct Plagiarism: Copying text word-for-word without citation.
• Self-Plagiarism: Reusing one’s own previously published work without acknowledgment.
• Mosaic Plagiarism: Paraphrasing text from a source without proper attribution.
• Data Plagiarism: Using data or research findings without permission or citation.
• Source-Based Plagiarism: Incorrect or misleading citation of sources.

All forms of plagiarism are considered unethical and unacceptable.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts are free from plagiarism before submission. This includes:

• Properly citing all sources and references
• Using quotation marks for direct quotations
• Paraphrasing appropriately while maintaining originality
• Avoiding excessive reliance on previously published work

Authors are encouraged to use plagiarism detection tools independently prior to submission to identify and correct potential issues.

If plagiarism is detected during the initial screening or peer review process, the journal will take appropriate action based on the severity of the issue. Possible actions include:

• Returning the manuscript for revision
• Rejecting the manuscript
• Banning the author from future submissions (in severe cases)

If plagiarism is discovered after publication, the journal reserves the right to take corrective measures, including issuing corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern. The journal may also notify the authors’ affiliated institutions if necessary.

All plagiarism checks are conducted confidentially. The results of plagiarism screening are used solely for editorial decision-making and are not disclosed to unauthorized parties.

The editorial team ensures that all cases of suspected plagiarism are handled fairly, objectively, and transparently. Authors are given the opportunity to respond to allegations and provide explanations before any final decision is made.

The Journal of Economics and Business Letters is committed to continuously improving its plagiarism detection practices and raising awareness about ethical writing among authors. The journal encourages authors to familiarize themselves with proper citation practices and ethical research conduct.

Educational efforts, such as providing clear guidelines and recommendations, are part of the journal’s strategy to prevent plagiarism and promote academic integrity.

The journal utilizes advanced plagiarism detection tools to ensure accurate and comprehensive analysis. These tools compare manuscripts against extensive databases of academic publications and online resources.

While technology plays a crucial role in identifying similarities, the final decision always involves human judgment. The editorial team carefully interprets the results to ensure fairness and avoid misclassification.

Through its plagiarism screening policy, the Journal of Economics and Business Letters aims to uphold the credibility, reliability, and scholarly value of all published research. The journal is dedicated to fostering a culture of honesty, transparency, and accountability in academic publishing.

By submitting a manuscript to the journal, authors acknowledge and agree to comply with the journal’s plagiarism screening policies and ethical standards.