Legal analysis of the application of ultimum remedium towards state officials' discretion causing state financial losses

Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi

doi:10.55942/pssj.v5i9.667

Authors

Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi Universitas Prima Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-841X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i9.667

Keywords:

Ultimum Remedium, Discretion, State Financial Losses, Integrity

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the ultimum remedium principle to discretionary actions by state officials that result in financial losses to the state. In practice, the law enforcement of discretionary actions often gives rise to debates between protecting the freedom of administrative decision-making and enforcing criminal law within the framework of corruption eradication. This study uses a normative legal method with a statute, conceptual, and case study approach, which allows for a comprehensive analysis of the applicable legal framework and its implementation practices. The results show that the application of the ultimum remedium principle is in line with the principle of due process of law and the protection of legitimate discretion, as long as it meets the elements of compliance with procedures, is based on good faith, and is not motivated by self-enrichment or other motives. Thus, criminal law is truly applied as a means of last resort, achieving a balance between protecting public officials with integrity and effective law enforcement to realize good governance, where policy innovation and courage to make decisions are protected, without neglecting accountability and integrity in government administration.

Author Biography

Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi, Universitas Prima Indonesia

Dr. Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi is an Associate Professor at Universitas Prima Indonesia with a strong academic background and extensive expertise in legal studies. He earned his Bachelor of Law (S.H.) from Universitas Padjadjaran in 2006, followed by a Master of Law (M.H.) from Universitas Gadjah Mada in 2010, and later completed his Doctorate in Law (Dr.) at Universitas Jayabaya in 2015. Specializing in legal frameworks, governance, and public policy, Dr. Sianturi is an active researcher and academic contributor, frequently engaging in publications and conferences focused on contemporary legal issues in Indonesia. He is also indexed in major academic platforms, reflecting his commitment to advancing legal scholarship both nationally and internationally.

References

Ansori, L. (2015). Diskresi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yuridis, 2(1), 135–150.

AR, H. K., Rahman, A., & Bima, M. R. (2024). Diskresi yang menjadi objek sengketa tata usaha negara berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 5(1), 90–106.

Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum.

Endang, M. I. A. (2018). Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan/Discretion and Responsbility of Government Officials Based on Law of State Administration. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(2), 223–244.

Fithri, B. S., Munthe, R., & Lubis, A. A. (2021). Asas Ultimum Remedium/The Last Resort Principle Terhadap Pelaku Usaha dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Doktrina: Journal of Law, 4(1), 68–83.

Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Indriana, Y. (2018). Pengembalian ganti rugi keuangan negara pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Cepalo, 2(2), 123–130.

Mubarak, R., & Trisna, W. (2021). Penentuan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Pejabat Pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 8(2), 174–182.

Muhlizi, A. F. (2012). Reformulasi Diskresi dalam Penataan Hukum Administrasi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(1), 93–111.

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2019). Hukum responsif. Nusamedia.

Pardede, M. (2020). Aspek Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Dalam Bidang Perpajakan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(3), 335–362.

Prasetyo, J. (2021). Rekonstruksi Diskresi Kepolisian Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Ringan Berbasiskan Nilai Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).

Rahmawati, N. A. (2013). Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Ultimum Remedium Atau Primum Remedium. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 2(1).

Saputra, D. T. (2017). Ganti Kerugian Dan Rehabilitasi Dalam Perkara Pidana. Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang.

Setiawan, A., & Ma’ruf, U. (2017). Penerapan Unsur Dapat Merugikan Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(3), 517–526.

Siregar, A. G. (2023). Implementasi Asas Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Administratif. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4), 10271–10285.

Siswanto, H. (2020). Pengawasan Dan Penerapan Sanksi Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha Yang Tidak Memiliki Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Amdal). Lex Administratum, 8(2).

Sitompul, R. M., & Maysarah, A. (2021). Ultimum Remedium Principles In Criminal Decisions In Creating Restorative Justice. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 7(1), 32–46.

Solechan, S. (2019). Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Pelayanan Publik. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(3), 541–557.

Tersiana, A. (2018). Metode penelitian. Anak Hebat Indonesia.

Wibowo, K. T., SH, M. H., & Warih Anjari, S. H. (2022). Hukum pidana materiil. Prenada Media.

Yoserwan, S. H., & MH, L. L. M. (2021). Doktrin Ultimum Remedium dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Implementasinya dalam Hukum Pidana Ekonomi)-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Yuhdi, M. (2013). Peranan diskresi dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Likhitaprajna, 15(1), 69–83.

Yulikhsan, E. (2016). Keputusan Diskresi dalam Dinamika Pemerintahan (Aplikasi dalam PTUN). Deepublish.