The influence of online shopping attributes on fashion consumers’ satisfaction and loyalty: Evidence from Indonesian e-commerce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/jebl.v4i5.238Keywords:
e-commerce, fashion, delivery, product variety, customer loyaltyAbstract
This study examines how online shopping attributes shape satisfaction and loyalty among Indonesian fashion e-commerce users. Using a quantitative, descriptive–associative, cross-sectional design, we surveyed 170 consumers who had made at least one online purchase. The model specifies Information Quality, Privacy, Security, Delivery/Fulfillment, and Product Variety as antecedents; Customer Satisfaction as a mediator; Price as a moderator; and Customer Loyalty as the outcome. Measurement diagnostics indicate acceptable reliability and validity (CR > 0.87; AVE > 0.50; HTMT < 0.90). Structurally, the attributes explain substantial variance in Satisfaction (R² ≈ 0.703), while Satisfaction and Price account for moderate variance in Loyalty (R² ≈ 0.462 without moderation; ≈ 0.485 with the interaction). Delivery/Fulfillment (β ≈ 0.468, p < .001) and Product Variety (β ≈ 0.403, p < .001) significantly increase Satisfaction; Information Quality, Privacy, and Security do not. Satisfaction positively predicts Loyalty (β ≈ 0.314, p = .009). Price exerts a strong direct effect on Loyalty (β ≈ 0.456, p < .001) but does not significantly moderate the Satisfaction→Loyalty path (β ≈ 0.021, p = .263). The findings imply that logistics reliability and perceived assortment breadth are decisive levers for satisfaction in fashion e-commerce, while competitive, transparent pricing builds loyalty in parallel. Privacy and security appear to function as threshold “qualifiers”—necessary but not differentiating drivers of satisfaction in this mature platform context. Managerial priorities should emphasize SLA-backed delivery, assortment architecture, and durable value programs rather than expecting discounts to amplify the satisfaction–loyalty linkage.
References
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
Barnes, L., & Lea-Greenwood, G. (2006). Fast fashioning the supply chain: Shaping the research agenda. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679259
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Rahayu, S. (2021). Pengaruh harga, kepercayaan dan kualitas produk terhadap keputusan pembelian pengguna e-commerce tokopedia. Mbia, 20(1), 40-50.
Ribadu, M. B., & Rahman, W. N. W. A. (2019). An integrated approach towards Sharia compliance E-commerce trust. Applied computing and informatics, 15(1), 1-6.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.
Thabang Excellent Mofokeng | (2021) Dampak atribut belanja online terhadap kepuasan dan loyalitas Konsumen : Efek moderat dari pengalaman e-commerce, Cogent Business & Management, 8:1, 1968206, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1968206
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ferdy Syafrial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









