Algorithmic exposure and identity work among Indonesia’s generation z creators: reframing work culture in the platform economy

Muhammad Hikmal   Yazid

doi:10.55942/pssj.v6i3.926

Authors

Muhammad Hikmal Yazid YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN AL IHSAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i3.926

Keywords:

platform labour, algorithmic exposure, identity work, precarity, generation z, creative economy

Abstract

This article examines how Indonesia’s Generation Z creative workers negotiate autonomy, identity, and precarity within the algorithmic infrastructures of the digital platform economy. Drawing on a mixed-method study across Jakarta, Bandung, and Yogyakarta (n = 312 survey; 20 interviews), the paper develops an integrated model linking platform affordances, algorithmic exposure, and identity work to income volatility and well-being. While theories of platform labour and identity work often derive from Western individualistic contexts, this study positions the Indonesian case as a boundary condition—where collectivist norms and affective reciprocity modify the logic of algorithmic precarity. Findings reveal that creative autonomy is increasingly mediated by algorithmic visibility metrics, transforming personal branding into a form of economic labour. Autonomy and creative freedom coexist with structural insecurity, producing a paradox of entrepreneurial dependence. The article contributes theoretically by identifying three mechanisms—algorithmic exposure, self-branding labour, and communal buffering—that reconfigure the platform–labour–identity nexus in emerging economies. Policy implications include the need for portable social protection, algorithmic transparency, and regional creative infrastructure to stabilize digital livelihoods. By integrating quantitative indicators with qualitative narratives, the study advances a socio-economic understanding of how digital capitalism reshapes work, identity, and social reproduction in Southeast Asia.

Author Biography

Muhammad Hikmal Yazid, YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN AL IHSAN

Muhammad Hikmal Yazid is affiliated with Division of Strategic Studies and Research, Al Ihsan Educational Foundation, Bekasi.

References

Фелл, Е. (2021). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. European Journal of Communication, 36(3), 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211006800

Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labour. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305

Antunès, I. (2023). Rethinking the growth of creative economy in Indonesia (Research Project Report 2023-11). ERIA. https://doi.org/10.21446/xxxxx

British Council, & Jakarta Arts Council. (2020). Jakarta creative practitioners and hubs mapping research. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/research-insight/Jakarta-Creative-Economy

Brown, A. D. (2015). Identities and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12035

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311

Digdowiseiso, K. (2023). The development of the creative economy in Indonesia’s post-pandemic development. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(3), 1664–1671. https://doi.org/10.29210/020232227

Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.

Fuchs, C. (2023). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book63

Gandini, A. (2016). The reputation economy: Understanding knowledge work in digital society. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478575

Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press.

Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2011). Creative labour: Media work in three cultural industries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855883

Hidayat, A. R., & Linando, N. (2024). Understanding Generation Z in the workplace: Work-life balance and job embeddedness in retention dynamics. Binus Business Review, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v15i3.11277

Hamidah, O. D., & Antonio, T. (2025). The influence of transformational leadership and shared leadership on innovative work behaviour among Generation Z employees in the creative industry in Surabaya: The role of organisational climate as a mediating variable. DIJEMSS, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4

Haryanti, H. (2025). Generation Z resilience in a hybrid work landscape: Lived experiences of creative industry employees in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Sciences & Business, xx(xx). https://doi.org/10.xxxxx

Lestariningsih, E., Maharani, K., & Lestari, T. K. (2019). Measuring creative economy in Indonesia: Issues and challenges in data collection. Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, 25(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx

Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain control. MIT Press.

Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 37(3), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.04

Luissa, B. A. (2024). Investigation of the antecedents of the digital mindset and its impact among Generation Z employees. Journal of Contemporary Work & Technology Studies, 25(2)

https://repository.unescap.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/94a8a474-78b1-4afe-98ab-683fe695635f/content#page=109

Nugroho, A. (2024). Indonesia Gen Z Report 2024. IDN Times. https://cdn.idntimes.com/content-documents/indonesia-gen-z-report-2024.pdf

Nugrohojati, I. S., & Linando, J. A. (2025). Understanding Generation Z in the workplace: Characteristics, challenges, and implications. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 3(3), 98–111. https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/42940

ObserverID. (2023). Collaboration to develop a “creative economy.” Observer. https://observerid.com/collaboration-to-develop-a-creative-economy/

Petriglieri, J. L. (2011). Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 641–662. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0087

RRI. (2025). Creative economy sector grows with younger generation’s contribution. Radio Republik Indonesia. https://rri.co.id/nasional/1390179/creative-economy-sector-grows-with-younger-generation-s-contribution

Smeru Research Institute. (2020). State of the ecosystem for youth entrepreneurship in Indonesia. https://smeru.or.id/en/publication/state-ecosystem-youth-entrepreneurship-indonesia

Standing, G. (2016). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.

United Nations Indonesia. (2024). Promoting social inclusion in the creative economy in support of the SDGs in Indonesia. https://indonesia.un.org/en/278810-promoting-social-inclusion-creative-economy-support-sdgs-indonesia-resident-coordinator-gita

Vallas, S. P., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2021).

Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Yadav, S., Agrawal, R. K., & Agrawal, M. (2024). Entrepreneurship as a career choice among youth: A study of perceived risk, motivation, and social support. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(10), 957–966. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i10.10649