The legal consequences of breach of performance in cooperation between service providers and companies that use event organizers (PT. Showbitz Mitra Utama)

Putri Yunita Sihotang; Alvin Hamzah Nasution

doi:10.55942/pssj.v5i8.643

Authors

Putri Yunita Sihotang Universitas Medan Area
Alvin Hamzah Nasution Universitas Medan Area https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-8841

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i8.643

Keywords:

Default, Cooperation Agreement, Event Organizer, Dispute Resolution

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of default in the cooperation agreement between service providers and companies that use Event Organizer services, especially at PT Showbitz Mitra Utama. The formulation of the problems raised in this study includes: (1) the implementation of the cooperation agreement between the provider and the user of Event Organizer services, (2) the legal consequences of default arising in the cooperation agreement, and (3) dispute resolution carried out by the parties in resolving the default that occurred. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study on PT Showbitz Mitra Utama, which is involved in a cooperative relationship with the Event Organizer service user company. The results show that the cooperation agreement between the two parties is generally regulated in the form of a written contract that includes the obligations and rights of each party. Default occurs when one party fails to fulfill the performance in accordance with the agreed provisions, which results in the obligation of compensation and dispute resolution through negotiation, mediation, or legal channels. Dispute resolution can be carried out with peaceful efforts between the two parties; however, if it fails, legal proceedings through the courts become the last resort. This research contributes to the understanding of the importance of written agreements and dispute resolution mechanisms in reducing the negative impact of defaults in relationships.

Author Biographies

Putri Yunita Sihotang, Universitas Medan Area

Putri Yunita Sihotang is a member of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Medan Area, specializing in business and contract law with a particular interest in legal risk management and corporate cooperation agreements.

Alvin Hamzah Nasution, Universitas Medan Area

Alvin Hamzah Nasution is a member of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Medan Area, focusing on civil and commercial law, with research interest in corporate partnerships and dispute resolution.

References

Abdussamad, H. Z., & Sik, M. S. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV. Syakir Media Press.

Adnyana, I. G. N. (2013). Upaya Hukum Keberatan dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 18(1), 95–104.

Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Anggusti, M., Siregar, F. Y. D., & Chansrakaeo, R. (2025). Corporate Social Responsibility Legal Framework in Southeast Asia: Comparing Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. SASI, 31(2), 188–200.

Bagenda, C., Rizkia, N. D., Fardiansyah, H., Hidayat, M. R., Soleh, Y. P., Usman, R., Amri, A., Suhartini, S., Kuahaty, S. S., & Akib, I. (2023). Hukum perdata. Penerbit Widina.

Dharmayuda, M. S., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Pritayanti, I. G. A. A. G. (2022). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Jasa Wedding Organizer Akibat Force Majeure. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 4(2), 130–135.

Emirzon, H. J., SH, M., Is, M. S., & SHI, M. H. (2021). Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Praktik. Prenada Media.

Gustiar, R. M. A. (2024). Pelaksanaan ganti rugi atas perjanjian kerja sama antara manajer artis dengan penyelenggara festival musik dalam rangkaian acara Edufest 2022 dihubungkan dengan KUHPerdata. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Hermalin, B. E., Katz, A. W., & Craswell, R. (2007). Contract law. Handbook of Law and Economics, 1, 3–138.

Is’ad, K., Handayani, O., & Aidy, W. R. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Pada Pembtalan Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Klien Dengan Perusahaan Wedding Organizer. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(1), 149–164.

Izmi, F. (2021). Akibat Pembatalan Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Klien Dan Vendor Pada Masa Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Studi Kasus Di Vendor Shofi Wedding Organizer). Dinamika, 27(11), 1647–1665.

Maidianti, S. (2024). Perlidungan Hukum Wedding Organizer Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama Dengan Konsumen Wanprestasi. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 6(2), 332–347.

Mescher, D. B. (2009). Business Ethics and the Law of Contract. Journal of Law and Financial Management, 8(2), 8–12.

Pangestu, M. T. (2019). Pokok-pokok hukum kontrak. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Putri, N. K. C. A., Dantes, K. F., & Setianto, M. J. (2023). MEKANISME PELAKSANAAN DAN PENETAPAN GANTI KERUGIAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGADAAN TANAH DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012 (Studi Kasus Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pelebaran Jalan Menyambut KTT G20 Di Nusa Dua). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 3(2), 50–59.

Rafiqi, R., Meher, M., & Siregar, F. Y. D. (2025). Corruption and Marriage Agreements Legal Analysis of Property Ownership. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 556–564.

Siregar, M., Siregar, F. Y. D., Rafiqi, R., & Muniifah, N. (n.d.). Deontological Study of the Binding Strength of Precontractual Promises: A Legal and Ethical Approach. JURNAL AKTA, 12(2), 527–534.

Sutantio, R., & Oeripkartawinata, I. (2009). Hukum acara perdata dalam teori dan praktek. Mandar Maju.

Triandini, N. A., Febrianti, F. D., Risambessy, J., Rafiqi, R., Siregar, F. Y. D., Ramadhan, C., Meher, M., Sitorus, N. T., Fatimah, N., & Hansen, S. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Mix Method. Literasi Bangsa Foundation.

Yahya Harahap. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika.