Enhancing collaborative competence and learning motivation through group investigation in civic education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i9.561Keywords:
Group investigation, Learning motivation, participatory action research, citizenship education, collaborative learningAbstract
Many Civic Education courses in higher education suffer from low student engagement, primarily due to passive learning models that limit motivation and collaborative interaction. Although cooperative learning strategies have been widely studied in primary and secondary education, their integration into civic-oriented university courses remains underexplored. This study investigates the application of the Group Investigation (GI) model to improve university students’ learning motivation and collaboration in Civic Education. Employing a participatory action research approach in a higher education setting, the study was conducted in two cycles involving 68 undergraduate students enrolled in a general education course. Data were collected using observation sheets, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired-sample t-tests, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The results showed a statistically significant improvement in students' learning motivation (from M = 73.7 to M = 84.2, p < 0.001) and collaborative character (from M = 71.4 to M = 83.6, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the GI model supports both the affective and cognitive aspects of learning by promoting student autonomy, inquiry-based dialogue, and mutual responsibility. Theoretically, this study contributes to the literature on cooperative learning in higher education and the design of democratic learning environments in Civic Education. Practically, it offers an adaptable model for educators seeking to develop soft skills through group-based inquiries. The research implies that integrating cooperative methods into civic education may offer a viable pathway for developing character and motivation in future professionals.
References
Alfajriah, R. S., Fahri, M., & Yono, Y. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation terhadap Hasil Belajar PPKn Kelas 3 di MI Ikhwanul Muslimin. Journal on Education, 6(4), 18362–18371. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.5782
Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, Group Identity, and Citizenship Education in a Global Age. Journal of Education, 194(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741419400302
BERA. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. In British Educational Research Association (BERA) (Fourth Edi, Vol. 20, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1984.10483191
Bransen, D., Govaerts, M. J. B., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Driessen, E. W. (2020). Beyond the self: The role of co-regulation in medical students’ self-regulated learning. Medical Education, 54(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14018
Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why Action Research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement potential of the concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Habók, A., & Nguyen, L. A. T. (2024). A comparative study of language learners’ ICT attitudes and behavior pre- and post-COVID-19. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50872-0
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Keller, J. (2008). An Integrative Theory of Motivation , Volition , and Performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 6(2), 79–104. http://terrikrause.com/Content/documents/Keller2008IntegrativeTheory.pdf
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner, 3rd Edition. Springer International Publishing.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(December 2012), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Lovat, T., Toomey, R., & Clement, N. (2023). International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. In Springer Internasional Handbooks of Education (Second). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24420-9
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). In Sage Publications (3rd ed). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://aulasvirtuales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods-by-michael-patton.pdf
Putri, W., Darmuji, & Hasanah, K. (2024). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation ( GI ) Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional, 2(3), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v2i3.489
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
Suhaida, D., & Fadillah, S. (2019). Analisis model pembelajaran berbasis pendidikan karakter untuk membentuk karakter siswa. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v16i2.21757
Suja, I. K., Putra, I. G. A. S., Yasa, I. M. A., & Kanca, I. N. (2024). The Influence of a Group Investigation Type Cooperative Learning Model with Performance Assessment on Understanding The Concept of Pancasila. Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-622-2_95
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Vargas-Hernández, J. G., & Vargas-González, O. C. (2022). Strategies for meaningful learning in higher education. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.41
Wardanik, R. A., Suryandari, K. C., & Salimi, M. (2024). Penerapan Model Cooperative Tipe Group Investigation untuk Meningkatkan Profil Pelajar Pancasila Aspek Kerja Sama. Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v12i1.76076
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Syamsuddin Syams, Mukhamad Murdiono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

