Agriculture as a transitional field towards habitus renewal: Examining the impact of technology and social structural change on rural development in Cibodas, West Java
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i11.882Keywords:
smart farming, habitus, capital, technology, rural development, social structure, CibodasAbstract
This study examines how social change occurs through the transition to smart farming in Cibodas Village, West Java, Indonesia. Using Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital, and field within a constructivist paradigm, this study employed qualitative methods, including participant observation, in-depth interviews, and analysis of policy documents and training materials related to smart farming. The results show that applying IoT technology for automated irrigation for fertilization and microclimate monitoring in smart farming can simplify agricultural operations and transform farmers' habits and village government structures, orienting them toward the use of advanced technology. This shift occurs as cultural capital based on digital technology is transformed into symbolic capital, thereby increasing sales confidence. This shift is particularly pronounced among young farmers, who utilize digital knowledge to simplify agricultural operations and sales mechanisms. However, for elderly farmers, their lack of literacy skills and limited access to information pose a potential disadvantage in facilitating the Cibodas Village. Agriculture in Cibodas serves as a platform for mobilizing and negotiating various forms of capital. This underscores the need for technology adoption to drive change and promote more equitable social development.
References
Abdulai, A.-R., Gibson, R., & Fraser, E. D. G. (2023). Beyond transformations: Zooming in on agricultural digitalization and the changing social practices of rural farming in Northern Ghana, West Africa. Journal of Rural Studies, 100, 103019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103019
Agbenyega, J. S. (2015). Theorizing Rural Transformation Through Bourdieuian Lenses: Trumping Dominant Models With Sustainable Indigenous Practices. Journal of Education and Research, 4(2), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v4i2.12385
Brunori, G. (2006). Post-rural processes in wealthy rural areas: Hybrid networks and symbolic capital. Research in Rural Sociology and Development, 12, 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1057-1922(06)12006-5
Butler, D., & Holloway, L. (2016). Technology and Restructuring the Social Field of Dairy Farming: Hybrid Capitals, ‘Stockmanship’ and Automatic Milking Systems. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12103
Calderón Gómez, Daniel. (2020). The third digital divide and Bourdieu: Bidirectional conversion of economic, cultural, and social capital to (and from) digital capital among young people in Madrid. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820933252
Cao Thanh, N., & Thi Le Thanh, T. (2015). The Interconnection Between Interpretivist Paradigm and Qualitative Methods in Education. In American Journal of Educational Science (Vol. 1, Issue 2). http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ajeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Carolan, M. S. (2005). Barriers to the Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture on Rented Land: An Examination of Contesting Social Fields. Rural Sociology, 70(3), 387–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1526/0036011054831233
Czerniewicz, L. (2014). The habitus and technological practices of rural students: a case study. In South African Journal of Education (Vol. 34, Issue 1). http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za
Daniswara, N., & Budirahayu, T. (2025). Impact of Environmental Degradation in Seulawah Dara Forest Through DPSIR Framework Approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1489(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1489/1/012014
Daniswara, N., Budirahayu, T., Ariadi, S., Reindrawati, D. Y., Abdillah, A., & Mutiara, A. (2025). Enhancing Urban Sustainability and Resilience: An Assessment of the Bandung Smart City Master Plan (2018-2023). Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2), 358–391. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080218
Demirel, P., Nemkova, E., & Taylor, R. (2021). Reproducing Global Inequalities in the Online Labour Market: Valuing Capital in the Design Field. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 914–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020942447
Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022). How to do qualitative research?: Qualitative research methods. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 129(7), 1166–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150
Eichholz, M., Van Assche, K., Oberkircher, L., & Hornidge, A.-K. (2013). Trading capitals? Bourdieu, land and water in rural Uzbekistan. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(6), 868–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.708650
Fahmi, Fikri Zul, & Mendrofa, Martha Jesica S. (2024). Digitalisation and Rural Livelihood Transformation: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Rural Management, 20(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052231223822
Fantasia, Rick. (2008). In the Spirit of Bourdieu. Contemporary Sociology, 37(3), 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/009430610803700306
Ferguson, Dianne L. (1993). Something a Little Out of the Ordinary: Reflections on Becoming an Interpretivist Researcher in Special Education. Remedial and Special Education, 14(4), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259301400408
Harracá, M., Castelló, I., & Gawer, A. (2023). How Digital Platforms Organize Immaturity: A Sociosymbolic Framework of Platform Power. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40
Hoang, H. G. (2020). Exploring farmers’ adoption of VietGAP from systemic perspective: implication for developing agri-food systems. British Food Journal, 122(12), 3641–3661. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2019-0724
Jain, Sheena. (2013). Bourdieu’s sociology: A post-positivist science. Thesis Eleven, 117(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513613492589
Lietz, Cynthia A, Langer, Carol L, & Furman, Rich. (2006). Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Social Work: Implications from a Study Regarding Spirituality. Qualitative Social Work, 5(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006070288
Ludwig, D., Boogaard, B., Macnaghten, P., Leeuwis, C., Ludwig, D., Boogaard, B., Macnaghten, P., & Leeuwis, C. (2021). The politics of knowledge in inclusive development and innovation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003112525
Mets-Oja, S., Lubi, K., & Toots, A. (2025). Coping with maternity care in rural areas: A holistic approach using Bourdieusian concepts of capital and fields. Health & Place, 93, 103445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103445
Morse, J. M. (2015). Analytic strategies and sample size. In Qualitative Health Research (Vol. 25, Issue 10, pp. 1317–1318). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315602867
Preininger, E. M. (2024). How agriculture performs urbanity: connecting urbanization and socio-practical shifts in farming cultures. Fennia, 202(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.129582
Pulla, V., & Carter, E. (2018). Employing Interpretivism in Social Work Research. In International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice Horizon Research Publishing (Vol. 6, Issue 1).
Radoll, Peter. (2011). The Primary Determinants of Indigenous Household Information and Communication Technology Adoption: Remote, Rural and Urban. Australasian Psychiatry, 19(1_suppl), S49–S52. https://doi.org/10.3109/10398562.2011.583075
Reed-Danahay, D. (2002). Remembering Pierre Bourdieu 1930-2002. Anthropological Quarterly, 75(2), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2002.0038
Regan, Á. (2019). ‘Smart farming’ in Ireland: A risk perception study with key governance actors. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 100292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.02.003
Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education: JTPE, 37(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084
Sallaz, J. J., & Zavisca, J. (2007). Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980–2004. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131627
Sutherland, L. A. (2020). Finding ‘Hobby’ Farmers: A ‘Parish Study’ Methodology for Qualitative Research. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12262
Tofu, D. A., & Mengistu, M. (2023). Observed time series trend analysis of climate variability and smallholder adoption of new agricultural technologies in west Shewa, Ethiopia. Scientific African, 19, e01448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01448
Upadhyay, P. (2012). Interpretivist tradition in qualitative anthropological research writings. Himalayan Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 5(0), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.3126/hjsa.v5i0.7044
Wang, H., Chen, M., & Zheng, B. (2017). The Research on the Path of Rural Bank’s Transformation Based on Bourdieu*’s Practice Theory: A Case Study of Wuwei Rural Bank in China. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(03), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2017.103025
Yuan, Y., & Sun, Y. (2024). Practices, Challenges, and Future of Digital Transformation in Smallholder Agriculture: Insights from a Literature Review. In Agriculture (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 12). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122193
Zahle, J. (2021). Interpretivism and Qualitative Research. In Stephen Turner and the Philosophy of the Social (pp. 202–220). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004449602_012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nirwasita Daniswara, Erwando Erwando

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









