Transformative deep learning in secondary education: the 3P framework for inclusive and sustainable knowledge development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i10.647Keywords:
Transformative Learning, Deep Learning, 3P Framework, Secondary Education, Inclusive Pedagogy, Authentic AssessmentAbstract
This study explores the potential of the 3P (Precise, Process, Product) framework to incorporate the principles of transformative and deep learning in secondary education. This research addresses the urgent need for meaningful, reflective, and student-centered learning to tackle the complex challenges of the 21st century. A qualitative case study was conducted at a secondary school using purposive sampling of curriculum coordinators, teachers, and policymakers. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and observation of classes. Thematic analysis, supported by NVivo 12 software, showed that the Precise component helps formulate clear and focused learning objectives; the Process component encourages reflective dialogue, active participation, and an inclusive learning environment; and the Product component fosters authentic, project-based assessment practices. The findings indicate that the 3P framework has shifted learning from exam-centered methods to an emphasis on deep understanding, inclusivity, and global citizenship. Challenges included gaps in teacher training, low digital literacy, and unequal access, while solutions emerged at the teacher, school, and policy levels. The framework proved to be versatile and effective, enhancing students’ learning identity and social awareness, and aligning curriculum standards with classroom practice. This study offers a conceptual contribution to curriculum transformation by presenting an adaptive and sustainable pedagogical model that supports Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 on inclusive and quality education.
References
Agustin, A. (2025). Tren dan Evolusi Penelitian Terkait Pendidikan untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Sebuah Kajian Bibliometrik. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(2), 944–955. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i2.1190
Anand, T. S., Anand, S. V, Welch, M., Marsick, V. J., & Langer, A. (2020). Overview of transformative learning I: theory and its evolution. Reflective Practice, 21(6), 732–743.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1821942
Andriana, A. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Deep Learning Bagi Siswa Inklusi di Pendidikan Vokasi. Jurnal Tiarsie, 18(4), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.32816/tiarsie.v18i4.129
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1–19. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej1137298
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons.
Compass, O. O. L. (2019). 2030: A Series of Concept Notes. Paris, France: OECD.
Corbin, J. (2021). Strauss’s grounded theory. In Developing grounded theory (pp. 25–44). Routledge.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning.
Gottschalk, F., & Weise, C. (2023). Digital equity and inclusion in education: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 299, 0_1-75. DOI:10.1787/7cb15030-en
Hancock, D. R., Algozzine, B., & Lim, J. H. (2021). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers.
Hidayatullah, E. (2024). Rekonstruksi konseptual pendidikan holistik: Pendekatan fenomenologis terhadap inklusivitas dan kesadaran sosial. Jurnal Studi Edukasi Integratif, 1(1), 55–68.
Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo.
Koutsouris, G., Bremner, N., & Stentiford, L. (2024). Do we have to rethink inclusive pedagogies for secondary schools? A critical systematic review of the international literature. British Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3926
Lagoudaki, E., Gareiou, Z., & Zervas, E. (2024). Comparative review of the application of education for sustainable development in secondary education in Europe. E3S Web of Conferences, 585, 4007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458504007
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
May, T., & Perry, B. (2022). Social research: Issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
OECD. (2019). An OECD learning framework 2030. In The future of education and labor (pp. 23–35). Springer.
Mailani, E., Rarastika, N., Saragih, H. A., Butar, G. J. P. B., & Tarigan, O. G. (2025). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas 3 SD Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan
Pendekatan Deep Learning Dan Media Interaktif. Journal Educational Research and Development| EISSN: 3063-9158, 1(4), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.62379/jerd.v1i4
Marradi, C., & Mulder, I. (2022). Scaling local bottom-up innovations through value co-creation. Sustainability, 14(18), 11678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811678
Maulana, A. R., Subroto, D. E., Oktaviana, Y., Zamri, F. M., & Tirtana, N. Z. (2025). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa dan Guru yang Menggunakan Kurikulum Berbasis Nilai Filosofi John Dewey dan Kurikulum Tradisional. JIMAD: Jurnal Ilmiah Mutiara Pendidikan, 3(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.61404/jimad.v3i1.361
Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The role of triangulation in qualitative research: Converging perspectives. In Principles of conducting qualitative research in multicultural settings (pp. 98–129). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch006
Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664
Navas-Bonilla, C. del R., Guerra-Arango, J. A., Oviedo-Guado, D. A., & Murillo-Noriega, D. E. (2025).
Inclusive education through technology: a systematic review of types, tools and characteristics. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1527851. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1527851
Osipovskaya, E., & Dmitrieva, S. (2021). The Issue of Adaptive Learning as Educational Innovation. International Conference on Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future, 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89708-6_50
Patton, M. Q. (2020). Evaluation use theory, practice, and future research: reflections on the Alkin and King AJE series. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140209194
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation methods, 4th edn.(Thousand Oaks; London. Sage Publications New Delhi.
Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.09.005
Salguero, A., Villegas Molina, I., Elizabeth Margulieux, L., Cutts, Q., & Porter, L. (2024). Applying CS0/CS1 Student Success Factors and Outcomes to Biggs’ 3P Educational Model. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 1168–1174.
Saleh, A. R., Muis, A. A., Lestari, U., Irma, I., Tajuddin, T., & Taufik, T. (2025). Designing Meaningful Learning: A Theoretical and Practical Study on Learning and Instruction. Proceeding of Islamic International Conference on Education, Communication, and Economics, 1, 573–583.
Sharma, P. K. (2025). Galvanizing Education for Sustainable Development Practice Through the Greening Education Partnership: Steering Green Schools Towards 2030 and Beyond. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 09734082251355099. https://doi.org/10.1177/09734082251355099
Subban, P., Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., & May, F. (2022). Student experiences of inclusive education in secondary schools: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103853
Taylor, E. W. (2018). Transformative learning theory. Educare Gli Affetti: Studi in Onore Di Bruno Rossi.-(I Problemi Dell’educazione), 301–320.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.
Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174
United Nations Educational, S. and C. O. (UNESCO). (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Unesco Paris, France.Vesterinen, M., & Ratinen, I. (2024). Sustainability competences in primary school education–a systematic literature review. Environmental Education Research, 30(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2170984
Ward, R. J., Bristow, S. J., Kovshoff, H., Cortese, S., & Kreppner, J. (2022). The effects of ADHD teacher training programs on teachers and pupils: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of
Attention Disorders, 26(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720972801
Watson, J., & Smith, C. (2022). Statistics education at a time of global disruption and crises: A growing challenge for the curriculum, classroom and beyond. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(2), 171–179.
Widiastuti, I. (2025). Assessing the Impact of Education Policies in Indonesia: Challenges, Achievement, and Future Direction. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 1955–1964. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6803
Wolff, L.-A. (2023). Transformative learning. In Encyclopedia of sustainable management (pp. 3763–3772). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_301807
Yang, J., Shi, G., Zhu, W., & Sun, Y. (2025). Intelligent technologies in smart education: a comprehensive review of transformative pillars and their impact on teaching and learning methods. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05444-0
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Gottschalk, F., & Weise, C. (2023). Digital equity and inclusion in education: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 299, 0_1-75. https://doi.org/10.1787/7cb15030-en
Marradi, C., & Mulder, I. (2022). Scaling local bottom-up innovations through value co-creation. Sustainability, 14(18), 11678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811678
Osipovskaya, E., & Dmitrieva, S. (2021). The Issue of Adaptive Learning as Educational Innovation. International Conference on Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future, 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89708-6_50
Ward, R. J., Bristow, S. J., Kovshoff, H., Cortese, S., & Kreppner, J. (2022). The effects of ADHD teacher training programs on teachers and pupils: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720972801
Widiastuti, I. (2025). Assessing the Impact of Education Policies in Indonesia: Challenges, Achievement, and Future Direction. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 1955–1964. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6803
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Efendi Hidayatullah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

