Transparency and accountability in the justice system: Building public trust and justice
The Role of Public Trust in Fair Law Enforcement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i4.367Keywords:
Judicial Transparency, Accountability, Public Trust, Legal System, Virtual Ethnography, Legal Reform, Judicial IntegrityAbstract
This study critically examines the intricate relationship between transparency, accountability, and public trust in the justice system within a changing socio-political landscape. Grounded in legal theory and employing a qualitative methodology that integrates phenomenology, ethnology, and virtual ethnography, the research explores how societal values, cultural perceptions, and institutional practices shape trust in judicial institutions. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and digital ethnographic observations involving members of the public and judicial officials. Findings reveal that transparency particularly in court decisions, budget management, judicial appointments, and public access to information significantly enhances accountability and fosters institutional legitimacy. The study also highlights how perceptions of fairness, openness, and ethical conduct of law enforcement directly impact public confidence and legal compliance. Moreover, public trust is shown to strengthen social integration and the overall effectiveness of law enforcement by encouraging community participation and reducing legal cynicism. Policy recommendations include the institutionalization of performance evaluations, transparent financial reporting, and digital platforms for public engagement. These measures are proposed as critical steps to create a responsive, equitable, and trustworthy judicial system. The study contributes to the evolving discourse on legal reform and offers actionable strategies for enhancing judicial integrity and democratic governance.
References
Abeyratne, R. (2012). Strategic issues in air transport: Legal, economic and technical aspects. Springer Science & Business Media.
Aboelazm, K. S. (2025). A new era of public procurement: Critical issues of procuring artificial intelligence systems to produce public services. International Journal of Law and Management. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-06-2024-0208
Ahmad, M., Kuldasheva, Z., Nasriddinov, F., Balbaa, M. E., & Fahlevi, M. (2023). Is achieving environmental sustainability dependent on information communication technology and globalization? Evidence from selected OECD countries. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 31. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103178
Ahmed, S., Mushtaq, M., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., & Saniuk, S. (2023). Decomposed and composed effects of economic freedom on economic growth in south Asia. Heliyon, 9(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13478
Ardia, D. S. (2017). Privacy and court records: Online access and the loss of practical obscurity. University of Illinois Law Review, 2017(4), 1385–1454. Scopus.
Aulia, F., Adviorika U, C., Yuniarty, Fahlevi, M., Prabowo, H., & Muchardie, B. G. (2021). Analysis of chatbot program features towards customer satisfaction in the era of digitalization. Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol., ICIMTech, 604–607. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9535034
Bae, S. M., Masud, M., Kaium, A., & Kim, J. D. (2018). A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate sustainability disclosure: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), 2611.
Bai, J., & Hobbs, H. (2017). Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: A case for reform. Alternative Law Journal, 42(4), 286–291. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X17732707
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Beigzadeh, A., Nemati, N., Zarei, M., Kianiservak, I., & Rezaei, H. (2025). Exploring Educational Justice: A Qualitative Study of Perspectives from Students, Faculty Members, and Administrative Managers. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 32(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.34172/jkmu.4105
Boateng, F. D. (2014). Perceived organizational support and police officer effectiveness: Testing the organizational support theory in Ghana. International Criminal Justice Review, 24(2), 134–150.
Burton, S. L., Burrell, D. N., Nobles, C., White, Y. W., Dawson, M. E., Brown-Jackson, K. L., Muller, S. R., & Bessette, D. I. (2024). An in-depth qualitative interview: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on consent and transparency. In Multisector Insights in Healthcare, Social Sciences, Society, and Technology (pp. 248–269). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3226-9.ch014
Capucio, C. (2018). Legal aspects of the European Union participation in the WTO: Understanding subtleties of a delicate liaison. Brazilian Journal of International Law, 15(3), 291–305. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i3.5648
Castellano, P. S. (2021). Artifi cial intelligence in judicial systems. Quo vadis, justitia? Revista de Internet, Derecho y Politica, 33. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7238/IDP.V0I33.373817
Civitillo, R., Fusco, F., & Ricci, P. (2022). Accountability and social reporting in the Italian judicial system. Ceridap, 2022(4), 98–114. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2022-4-25
Dandurand, Y. (2014). Criminal justice reform and the system’s efficiency. Criminal Law Forum, 25(3), 383–440. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-014-9235-y
Daniels, B., Buntaine, M., & Bangerter, T. (2020). Testing transparency. Northwestern University Law Review, 114(5), 1263–1334. Scopus.
Fahlevi, M., Ahmad, M., Balbaa, M. E., Wu, T., & Aljuaid, M. (2023). The efficiency of petroleum and government health services to benefit life expectancy during the inefficiencies of hydroelectricity consumption. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 19, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100289
Fahlevi, M., Vional, & Pramesti, R. M. (2022). Blockchain technology in corporate governance and future potential solution for agency problems in Indonesia. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 721–726. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.3.010
Fibrianti, N., Santoso, B., Setyowati, R., & Rindyawati, Y. (2023). Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness of Consumers: The Influence on Regulation and Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69336
Flórez Petour, M. T., & Rozas Assael, T. (2020). Accountability from a social justice perspective: Criticism and proposals. Journal of Educational Change, 21(1), 157–182. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09361-3
Flynn, A., & Freiberg, A. (2018). Building Trust and Confidence in the Criminal Justice System. In Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies (pp. 207–220). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92630-8_9
Fu, Y. (2018). Court management in transformation China: A Perspective Of Civil Justice. Peking University Law Journal, 6(1), 81–103. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2018.1603639
Gorodensky, A., Bowra, A., Saeed, G., & Kohler, J. (2022). Anti-corruption in global health systems: Using key informant interviews to explore anti-corruption, accountability and transparency in international health organisations. BMJ Open, 12(12). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064137
Grenfell, L. (2017). Legal Pluralism and the Rule of Law in Timor Leste. In Public Law in East Asia (pp. 391–423). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315089263-14
Juhandi, N., Zuhri, S., Fahlevi, M., Noviantoro, R., Nur Abdi, M., & Setiadi. (2020). Information Technology and Corporate Governance in Fraud Prevention. 202. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020216003
Kolaneci, E., & Pejo, E. (2023). Transitional justice research in the digital age: Western Balkans results. Social and Legal Studios, 6(4), 89–96. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.89
Kumar, A. B., Sanjaya, K., & Saleem, M. (2025). Justice in the age of algorithms: Ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI-driven legal systems. In Artificial Intelligence in Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions (pp. 191–209). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9395-6.ch009
Lasser, M. D. S.-O.-L. (2010). Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy (p. 400). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575169.001.0001
Sahabuddin, M., Sakib, M. N., Rahman, M. M., Jibir, A., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., & Grabowska, S. (2023). The Evolution of FinTech in Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(9). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097176
Sharma, D., & Kumari, S. (2024). Role of Legal Education in Advancement of Access to Justice: A Panormic Insight. Asian Journal of Legal Education, 11(2), 141–149. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/23220058241253403
Shiradhonkar, A. J., Singh, S. B., & Mishra, M. K. (2021). eCourts Services-Transforming the Judiciary for Effective Justice Delivery. In Citizen Empowerment through Digital Transformation in Government (pp. 141–154). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003111351-8
Vo, V., Auroy, L., & Sarradon-Eck, A. (2019). Patients’ perceptions of mHealth apps: Meta-ethnographic review of qualitative studies. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(7), e13817.
Yusuf, M., Dasawaty, E. S., Esra, M. A., Apriwenni, P., Meiden, C., & Fahlevi, M. (2024). Integrated reporting, corporate governance, and financial sustainability in Islamic banking. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 273–290. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Misnah Irvita, Asriani Asriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

