Perceptions of pre-service elementary teachers toward the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in science portfolio creation

Edward Harefa

doi:10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1422

Authors

Edward Harefa Universitas Nias https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-6244

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1422

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, perception, science learning, portfolio, pre-service teacher

Abstract

The increasing availability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools has begun to influence teaching, learning, and assessment practices in elementary education, including portfolio-based assessment in science learning. This study explores pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions toward the use of AI in science portfolio creation. Employing a descriptive qualitative research design, data were collected from 15 pre-service elementary teachers through semi-structured interviews and written reflections. The data were analyzed thematically to identify shared perceptions, perceived benefits, and perceived challenges related to AI integration in portfolio-based assessments. The findings revealed that the participants generally held cautiously positive perceptions of AI. They view AI as a supportive tool that can assist students in organizing ideas, improving the clarity of scientific explanations, enhancing visual presentation, and increasing efficiency in portfolio development. However, participants also expressed significant concerns regarding overreliance on AI, reduced critical thinking, authenticity of student work, ethical issues related to authorship and academic honesty, and data privacy. In addition, many participants reported limited preparation and confidence in using AI for instructional and assessment purposes. This study highlights the importance of teacher guidance and clear boundaries to ensure that AI functions as a learning aid rather than as a substitute for student thinking. These findings suggest the need for stronger integration of AI literacy, ethical awareness, and assessment design within teacher education programmes to support the responsible and pedagogically sound use of AI in elementary science education.

Author Biography

Edward Harefa, Universitas Nias

Edward Harefa is a lecturer in the Department of Elementary Education at Nias University. He has published various research results in reputable international journals and accredited national journals, and has received various international and national research grants. His research fields are the integration of STEAM learning and artificial intelligence in elementary schools, learning media, and educational psychology.

References

Akanzire, B. N., Nyaaba, M., & Nabang, M. (2025). Generative AI in teacher education: Teacher educators’ perception and preparedness. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), ep2508. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15887

Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 2320–7388. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/Using thematic analysis in psychology

Butakor, P. K. (2024). Use of e-portfolios as a teaching, learning and assessment tool in higher education: differing opinions among Ghanaian pre-service teachers and nurses. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(6), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.6.858

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chung, J. Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2024). Exploring the perceptions of Chinese pre-service teachers on the integration of generative AI in English language teaching: Benefits, challenges, and educational implications. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), e202457. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15266

Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Doğan, Y., Yıldırım, N. T., & Batdı, V. (2024). Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 106, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461

Gamlem, S. M., McGrane, J., Brandmo, C., Moltudal, S., Sun, S. Z., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2025). Exploring pre-service teachers’ attitudes and experiences with generative AI: a mixed methods study in Norwegian teacher education. Educational Psychology, 1, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2025.2528663

Harefa, E. (2025). Implementasi pendekatan TPACK berbantuan Liveworksheet terhadap motivasi belajar dan berpikir kritis peserta didik dalam pembelajaran sains di sekolah dasar. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5, 2015–2025. http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/download/20438/13662

Harefa, E., & Gulo, H. (2024). Three-dimensional science animation implementation and spatial ability for science concept reconstruction: A gender-based education study. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68005

Hudori, R. F. ., Tasnim, Z., Fardhani, A. ., & Sari, D. P. (2020). The use of portfolio assessment in english writing classes. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485(1), 012093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012093

Ishmuradova, I. I., Zhdanov, S. P., Kondrashev, S. V., Erokhova, N. S., Grishnova, E. E., & Volosova, N. Y. (2025). Pre-service science teachers’ perception on using generative artificial intelligence in science education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep579. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16207

Kalenda, P. J., Rath, L., Abugasea Heidt, M., & Wright, A. (2025). Pre-service teacher perceptions of ChatGPT for lesson plan generation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 53(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241301388

Khasawneh, M. A. S., Aladini, A., Assi, S. A., & Ajanil, B. (2025). Portfolio assessment in AI-enhanced learning environments: a pathway to emotion regulation, mindfulness, and language learning attitudes. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00345-0

Laksana, I. P. Y., Virginiya, P. T., Yuliantini, N. N., Saraswati, N. P. R. T. A. K. H., & Sadiyani, N. W. (2025). Navigating AI-enhanced learning: A case study of e-portfolio assessment with Gemini AI in business English speaking development. International Conference on Sustainable Green Tourism Applied Science - Social Applied Science 2025, 2025, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-882-0_21

Ma, M., Ng, D. T. K., Liu, Z., Lin, J., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025). Why don’t teachers teach AI ethics? Understanding teachers’ beliefs and intentions in Chinese AI curriculum implementation through the theory of planned behaviour. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100518

Martin, F., Kim, S., Bolliger, D. U., & DeLarm, J. (2025). Assessment types, strategies, and feedback in online higher education courses in the age of artificial intelligence: Perspectives of instructional designers. TechTrends, 69(6), 1330–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01115-8

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4

Philippakos, Z. A. T., & Rocconi, L. (2025). AI Literacy: Elementary and secondary teachers’ use of AI-tools, reported confidence, and professional development needs. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091186

Prilop, C. N., Mah, D.-K., Jacobsen, L. J., Hansen, R. R., Weber, K. E., & Hoya, F. (2025). Generative AI in teacher education: Educators’ perceptions of transformative potentials and the triadic nature of AI literacy explored through AI-enhanced methods. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100471

Ramnarain, U., Ogegbo, A. A., Penn, M., Ojetunde, S., & Mdlalose, N. (2025). Pre-service science teachers’ intention to use generative artificial intelligence in inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(6), 1272–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10159-z

Rojas, M. P., & Chiappe, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and digital ecosystems in education: A review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(4), 2153–2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09732-7

Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024). Investigating pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202

Sarwandi, S., Wibawa, B., & Wibawa, R. (2022). Usage of e-portfolio as an assessment tool in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012043

Setyawarno, D., Rosana, D., & Kuswanto, H. (2025). ‘Assessment as learning’ in science instruction: a case study of Indonesian science teachers and notion for optimising in teaching and learning process. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2538337

Sun, J., Wu, Q., Ma, Z., Zheng, W., & Hu, Y. (2025). Understanding pre-service teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence: an extended technology acceptance model approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(4), 1975–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10495-w

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Yang, S., & Appleget, C. (2024). An exploration of preservice teachers’ perceptions of Generative AI: Applying the technological Acceptance Model. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 40(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.2367573

Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation and Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research (pp. 35–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3