Ethnicity as mobilization infrastructure: Pashtun identity and taliban insurgency in Afghanistan

Authors

  • Muhammad Hayyi’ Lana Alkhan Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Akbar Farid Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Ahmad Fauzi Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Zikri Rahmani Universitas Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1276

Keywords:

Pashtun, Taliban, mobilization, insurgency, governance, Afghanistan

Abstract

This study examines the role of Pashtun ethnicity in Taliban insurgency and post-2021 governance by conceptualizing ethnicity as mobilization infrastructure rather than as a primordial or deterministic cause of conflict. Drawing on a critical narrative review of recent scholarly and policy-oriented literature, this study analyzes how Pashtun identity operates through social networks, territorial ties, normative frameworks, and organizational continuity to enable recruitment, coordination, legitimacy, and political control. The findings show that Pashtun ethnicity has facilitated the Taliban’s organizational resilience and its transition from insurgency to governance, particularly through network-based mobilization and access to territorial sanctuaries. Simultaneously, the selective use of Pashtunwali has contributed to local legitimacy in Pashtun-majority areas while constraining broader national acceptance. The analysis further highlights the dual effect of ethnic dominance in the post-2021 political order: strengthening short-term stability and internal cohesion while exacerbating political exclusion and ethnic grievances. By specifying the mechanisms through which ethnic identity is transformed into mobilization capacity, this article contributes a mechanism-based framework to debates on ethnicity, insurgency, and governance in Afghanistan, offering a non-deterministic and analytically grounded understanding of conflict dynamics in multiethnic societies.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Hayyi’ Lana Alkhan, Universitas Bangka Belitung

Muhammad Hayyi Lana Alkhan is affiliated with Universitas Bangka Belitung.

Akbar Farid , Universitas Bangka Belitung

Akbar Farid is affiliated with Universitas Bangka Belitung.

Ahmad Fauzi , Universitas Bangka Belitung

Ahmad Fauzi is affiliated with Universitas Bangka Belitung.

Zikri Rahmani, Universitas Bangka Belitung

Zikri Rahmani is affiliated with Universitas Bangka Belitung.

References

Adeli, Z. (2021). The Consequences of Taliban Policies on Human Rights in Afghanistan. In Analysis from the East-West Center (Vol. 27, Issue 162).

Eslami, R., & Safari, M. (2022). The Role of Pashtunwali Ethnic Tradition in the Historical Articulation of the Taliban Discourse in Negotiations with the Afghan Government. Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies, 6(2), 371–409. https://doi.org/10.22059/wsps.2023.346782.1312

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329

Giustozzi, A. (2021). The Taliban at War: 2001–2021. Hurst & Company.

International Crisis Group. (2022). Afghanistan’s Security Challenges under the Taliban. (Asia Report No. 336). Brussels: International Crisis Group.

Kinnaree, T., Innayah, P., & Yulianti, D. (2025). Cultural Violence against Women under Taliban Rule in Afghanistan (2021-2022). Jurnal ICMES, 9(2), 135–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35748/jurnalicmes.v9i2.242

Kraus, J., & Zürcher, C. (2021). Mobilization, identity, and insurgency: Explaining variation in civil war participation. Civil Wars, 23(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2020.1869586

Mehran, W., Habib, S., & Riedel, Z. (2023). Rebel Governance: an analysis of the Taliban’s Governance from 2001-2021. Small Wars and Insurgencies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2023.2282817

Mirdad, M. A., Suyanto, B., & Hayat, M. U. (2025). The political instrumentalization of ethnic divisions and affiliations in Afghanistan (2001–2021). Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 38(4), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V38I42025.337-351

Rahimi, H. (2021). Taliban Caretaker Government_ Good for Internal Cohesion, Bad for Governance – The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/taliban-caretaker-government-good-for-internal-cohesion-bad-for-governance/

Schlichte, K., & Schneckener, U. (2015). Armed groups and the politics of legitimacy. Civil Wars, 17(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2015.1115573

Staniland, P. (2025). Major Power Rivalry and Domestic Politics in South Asia.

Termeer, A. (2023). Rebel Legal Order, Governance and Legitimacy: Examining the Islamic State and the Taliban Insurgency. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2231641

Terpstra, N., & Frerks, G. (2017). Rebel Governance and Legitimacy: Understanding the Impact of Rebel Legitimation on Civilian Compliance with the LTTE Rule. Civil Wars, 19(3), 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2017.1393265

Wimmer, A., Cederman, L.-E., & Min, B. (2009). Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict: A Configurational Analysis of a New Global Data Set. American Sociological Review - AMER SOCIOL REV, 74, 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400208

Zyla, B. (2025). The International Peace- and State-Building Intervention in Afghanistan: Distilling Lessons to Be Learned. Ethics and International Affairs, 39(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679425100026

Downloads

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

Alkhan, M. H. L. ., Farid , A. ., Fauzi , A. ., & Rahmani, Z. . (2026). Ethnicity as mobilization infrastructure: Pashtun identity and taliban insurgency in Afghanistan. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 6(1), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1276
Abstract Views: 1 | File Views: 3