Cross-generational comparative analysis of educators communication patterns: A case study at SMPN 2 Selat, Karangasem, Bali

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1197

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis, Cross-Generational, Communication Patterns, SMPN 2 Selat, Educators

Abstract

This study examines the comparative communication patterns of Generation X, Generation Y (Millennials), and Generation Z teachers in the context of Natural Science (IPA) instruction at SMPN 2 Selat, Karangasem, Bali. The presence of multiple generations in school environments creates distinct communication dynamics that influence the effectiveness of classroom interactions and students’ learning experiences. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documents. The analysis was conducted using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, which involves data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal significant generational differences in verbal and nonverbal communication, technology use, and teacher–student interaction styles. Generation X teachers exhibit formal, structured, and authoritative communication with a limited integration of digital media. Generation Y teachers employ a more balanced, interactive, and expressive communication approach, supported by the moderate use of technology. Meanwhile, Generation Z teachers demonstrate highly dynamic, informal, and technology-intensive communication styles that foster horizontal and student-centered interaction. These differences reflect the influence of generational characteristics on instructional communication and indicate that cross-generational diversity enriches pedagogical practices rather than hindering them. This study contributes to educational communication research by offering empirical insights into how generational identity shapes communication behavior in classroom settings, particularly in nonurban schools. The findings also have practical implications for designing teacher professional development programs that accommodate generational differences in communicative competencies.

Author Biographies

Ahmad Rofiki Rahman, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Ahmad Rofiki Rahman is a young lecturer in Communication Science at Undiknas University, Indonesia. His research interests include educational communication, intercultural communication, and generational communication dynamics within digital learning environments. He has contributed to various academic works focusing on communication practices in educational settings and the integration of technology in teaching.

Fenysia Alfiana, Universitas Mataram

Fenysia Alfiana is a Generation Z Natural Science (IPA) teacher at SMPN 2 Selat. Her professional experience as a digital-native educator contributes valuable empirical insights to studies on communication styles and pedagogical practices across generations. She actively integrates digital tools into science learning and supports research related to classroom communication behavior.

References

Cresswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (M. O’Heffernan (ed.); 5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf

Devito, J. A. (2013). The Interpersonal Communication Book. In The Speech Teacher (Vol. 21, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527209377915

Giles, H. (2025). Theoretical Approaches to Communicative Practices in the Study of Intergenerational Communication and Aging. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 101(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150241297398

Hatzir, N. A., & Segev, E. (2023). Intergenerational Communication: The Meaning of Communication Channels and Their Affordances. Journal of Family Communication, 23(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2126476

Juliano, S. (2015). Komunikasi Dan Gender : Perbandingan Gaya Komunikasi Dalam Budaya Maskulin Dan Feminim. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 5(01). https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v5i01.153

Kristiyanti, E. I., & Muhyadi, M. (2015). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Perempuan. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v3i1.6270

Lestari, A. D., & Yulianita, N. (2025). Gap Generation: Differences in Perspectives and Communication Styles. Jurnal Komunikatio, 11(1), 47–54.

Mardati, Q. N., Munanjar, A., & Syahril, R. (2025). Gaya Komunikasi Sutradara dalam Mengelola Koordinasi Antar Tim Produksi dan Talent pada Sinetron Terlanjur Indah. JIMU: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin, 04(01), 771–786.

Mea, F. (2024). Peningkatan Efektivitas Pembelajaran melalui Kreativitas dan Inovasi Guru dalam Menciptakan Kelas yang Dinamis. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 4(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.59404/ijce.v4i3.190

Mehra, P., & Nickerson, C. (2019). Organizational communication and job satisfaction: what role do generational differences play? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 524–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2017-1297

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://repositori.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/149484/qualitative-data-analysis-a-methods-sourcebook-3-e-.html

Mulyana, D. (2017). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Norton, R. (1983). Communicator Style: Theory, Applications, and Measures (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://archive.org/details/communicatorstyl0000nort/page/n5/mode/2up

Puspita, A. (2022). Komunikasi Interpersonal Orang Tua Dalam Pencegahan Pernikahan Dini Terhadap Anak Usia Remaja Di Kecamatan Banjarmasin Selatan. Jurnal Mutakallimin : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31602/jm.v5i2.8903

Putra, Y. S. (2016). Theroritical Review : Teori Perbedaan Generasi. Among Makarti, 1(1), 122–134. http://www.biblioteca.pucminas.br/teses/Educacao_PereiraAS_1.pdf%0Ahttp://www.anpocs.org.br/portal/publicacoes/rbcs_00_11/rbcs11_01.htm%0Ahttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/7845/1/td_2306.pdf%0Ahttps://direitoufma2010.files.wordpress.com/2010/

Rahman, A. R., & Astriani, A. (2023). Komunikasi Krisis Polri dalam Meningkatkan Reputasi dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Pascatragedi Sepak Bola di Kanjuruhan , Malang. 10(02), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.22236/komunika.v10i2.11042

Solaja, M., Idowu, E., & James, E. (2016). Exploring the relationship between leadership communication style, personality trait and organizational productivity. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm11-8480

Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Co.

Sugiyono, & Lestari, P. (2021). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. CV Alfabeta.

Wijaya, A. A., & Naryoso, A. (2017). Komunikasi Interpersonal Lintas Generasi Untuk Menghadapi Stres Akademik Pada Anak. Interaksi Online, 18(2), 1–7.

Zam, E. M. (2021). Peran Literasi Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v1i1.176

Downloads

Published

2026-01-08

How to Cite

Rahman, A. R., & Alfiana, F. (2026). Cross-generational comparative analysis of educators communication patterns: A case study at SMPN 2 Selat, Karangasem, Bali. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 6(1), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.1197
Abstract Views: 0 | File Views: 0